Response 66142029

Back to Response listing

About you

5. Who are you representing?

representing
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked I am responding as an individual
Radio button: Ticked I am responding on behalf of an organisation

6. Please note all responses will be published. Are you happy for your name to be included in the response publication?

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Yes - I want my response to be published with my name
Radio button: Ticked No - I want my response to be published anonymously

Organisation Details

7. What is your organisation name?

Org Name (Required)
Royal Brunei Airlines

Your Feedback

9. Do you support the airspace changes in this proposal?

Support/object
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Ticked SUPPORT - I support the proposed changes
Radio button: Unticked NO COMMENT - I neither support or object
Radio button: Unticked AMBIVALENT - I have mixed feelings
Radio button: Unticked OBJECT - I object to the proposed changes

10. Please rank your reaction to the individual aspects

FRA Option 1. In which all ATS routes are removed. Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support FRA Option 1. In which all ATS routes are removed. Support Radio button: Not checked Support FRA Option 1. In which all ATS routes are removed. Neutral Radio button: Not checked Neutral FRA Option 1. In which all ATS routes are removed. Object Radio button: Checked Object FRA Option 1. In which all ATS routes are removed. Strongly object Radio button: Not checked Strongly object
FRA Option 2. In which the ATS route structure is partially maintained. Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support FRA Option 2. In which the ATS route structure is partially maintained. Support Radio button: Not checked Support FRA Option 2. In which the ATS route structure is partially maintained. Neutral Radio button: Checked Neutral FRA Option 2. In which the ATS route structure is partially maintained. Object Radio button: Not checked Object FRA Option 2. In which the ATS route structure is partially maintained. Strongly object Radio button: Not checked Strongly object
FRA Option 3. In which the ATS route structure is maintained, but aircraft are not constrained to flight plan the routes within the FRA. Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support FRA Option 3. In which the ATS route structure is maintained, but aircraft are not constrained to flight plan the routes within the FRA. Support Radio button: Checked Support FRA Option 3. In which the ATS route structure is maintained, but aircraft are not constrained to flight plan the routes within the FRA. Neutral Radio button: Not checked Neutral FRA Option 3. In which the ATS route structure is maintained, but aircraft are not constrained to flight plan the routes within the FRA. Object Radio button: Not checked Object FRA Option 3. In which the ATS route structure is maintained, but aircraft are not constrained to flight plan the routes within the FRA. Strongly object Radio button: Not checked Strongly object

12. Please give your feedback comments on the overall proposal.

Overall comments
I believe the proposal is the way forward to more efficiently utilise the airspace.

13. Would you like to make more comments on any individual aspects?

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Yes
Radio button: Ticked No