Response 1064315990

Back to Response listing

Introduction

4. If responding from outside the UK, please supply an address or location description

Non UK address
Emirates Airline HQ

5. Who are you representing?

representing
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked I am responding as an individual
Radio button: Ticked I am responding on behalf of an organisation

6. Please note all responses will be published. Are you happy for your name to be included in the response publication?

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Yes - I want my response to be published with my name
Radio button: Ticked No - I want my response to be published anonymously

Organisation Details

7. What is your organisation name?

Org Name (Required)
Emirates Airline

8. What is your position/title?

Org Position
Manager Aeronautical Services & ATM

Your Feedback

9. Do you support the airspace changes in this proposal?

Support/object
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Ticked SUPPORT - I support the proposed changes
Radio button: Unticked NO COMMENT - I neither support or object
Radio button: Unticked AMBIVALENT - I have mixed feelings
Radio button: Unticked OBJECT - I object to the proposed changes

10. Please rank your reaction to the individual aspects

Use of RNAV1 Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support Use of RNAV1 Support Radio button: Checked Support Use of RNAV1 Neutral Radio button: Not checked Neutral Use of RNAV1 Object Radio button: Not checked Object Use of RNAV1 Strongly object Radio button: Not checked Strongly object
New position of Glasgow hold Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support New position of Glasgow hold Support Radio button: Not checked Support New position of Glasgow hold Neutral Radio button: Checked Neutral New position of Glasgow hold Object Radio button: Not checked Object New position of Glasgow hold Strongly object Radio button: Not checked Strongly object
Link routes for Glasgow Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support Link routes for Glasgow Support Radio button: Not checked Support Link routes for Glasgow Neutral Radio button: Checked Neutral Link routes for Glasgow Object Radio button: Not checked Object Link routes for Glasgow Strongly object Radio button: Not checked Strongly object
STARs for Glasgow Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support STARs for Glasgow Support Radio button: Not checked Support STARs for Glasgow Neutral Radio button: Checked Neutral STARs for Glasgow Object Radio button: Not checked Object STARs for Glasgow Strongly object Radio button: Not checked Strongly object
Link routes for Edinburgh Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support Link routes for Edinburgh Support Radio button: Not checked Support Link routes for Edinburgh Neutral Radio button: Checked Neutral Link routes for Edinburgh Object Radio button: Not checked Object Link routes for Edinburgh Strongly object Radio button: Not checked Strongly object

11. Please give your feedback comments on the overall proposal.

Overall comments
Looked at the changes and did not find anything to
In summary ATS routs, STARs and SIDs will change, the first two to RNAV5 the last one to RNAV1 – no issue for us.
The changes will replace the LANAK hold for GLA with the RULUR hold further upstream the route.

The idea was to improve efficiency and reduce fuel burn and emissions.
The new SIDs also promise less restricted climbs on departure and less ATC required early descents.
These changes are mostly on the south-western side and will primarily affect our arrivals , as our departures tend to fly more east out to the North Sea.



12. Would you like to make more comments on any individual aspects?

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Yes
Radio button: Ticked No