Introduction
1. What is your name?
Name
Jack Adams
Options
4. Please rank in order of preference the four options presented in the consultation paper. Rank using 1 for most preferred Option and 4 for least preferred Option.
Please rank these from 1 to 4
(Required)
Option 0 - Do Nothing
3
Option 1 - ATZ only
2
Option 2 - Covering the IAP without hold
1
Option 3 - Covering the full IAP
4
5. Please describe why you have ranked the options this way.
Ranking explanation
(Required)
The area proposed covers Such a large busy space of airspace. One of the only crossing areas around London due to the city and Stansted zones.
Adding such RMZ would increase the workload for the busy southend and Farnborough LARS services, in turn leading to a reduction in capacity for Traffic or Deconfliction services in this airspace.
It could also encourage people to cut corners or shoot gaps between airspace resulting in high amounts of Airprox and infringement.
This may also increase the amount of City zone crossings, and encourage people to use this route, breaking the glide clear rule and posing a larger threat to the people below.
Adding such RMZ would increase the workload for the busy southend and Farnborough LARS services, in turn leading to a reduction in capacity for Traffic or Deconfliction services in this airspace.
It could also encourage people to cut corners or shoot gaps between airspace resulting in high amounts of Airprox and infringement.
This may also increase the amount of City zone crossings, and encourage people to use this route, breaking the glide clear rule and posing a larger threat to the people below.
6. What alternatives to the RMZ proposal do you believe should be considered instead whether or not they help with the IAP introduction under the ACP?
RMZ Alternatives
(Required)
An RMZ does not fix the issue of aircraft flying though the areas. During a busy summer period, a call to London information, or a LARS provider is unlikely to happen with such efficiency as to provide the controller with enough time to inform the pilot before they have entered or routed through this airspace.
7. Please provide any other comments you wish to be considered.
Additional Comments
(Required)
N/A
8. Responses will be subject to moderation by the CAA. If you wish your response to be published anonymously, please indicate below and your personal details (Name, Address & Position) will be redacted and only be seen by the CAA.
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes - my responses can be published
Radio button:
Unticked
No - my responses cannot be published